
01 · Product name
IntelOwl
AGPL API that enriches files and observables.
Published by Certego.
In short
IntelOwl is the enrichment framework in intelowlproject/IntelOwl. The README says it enriches files and observables such as an IP, a domain, a URL, or a hash, through a Django REST API. Since v6.8.0 the README says management is fully in Certego's hands. On 17 Oct 2026 the GitHub API reported 4,761 stars and 693 forks, and the license field was AGPL-3.0. Release v6.8.0 was published on 31 Aug 2026. The project site's 4K-star and 200-analyzer lines are its own claims. You deploy it. An analyzer hit is a lead.
Product pricing strategy
02
Free
IntelOwl does not print a seat price on the repository or the project site opened on 17 Oct 2026. The license field is AGPL-3.0. You deploy the Docker stack and the Django API, and the project does not host your submissions on a metered public plan. The honeynet URL is a demo shell, not a price page. Analyzer plugins often call third-party services that have their own keys and fees. Those fees are not an IntelOwl subscription, and this listing does not invent them. The site's download and analyzer counts are marketing lines. They are not a rate card. If Certego sells a hosted offer, it was not the page reviewed here.
Utility and features
03
The IntelOwl README describes enrichment of threat information for files and for observables, a Django and Python REST API, and libraries for wiring the API into other tools. It names pyintelowl. The same README says that since v6.8.0 the project's management is fully in Certego's hands and points at GitHub discussion 3654. The API on 17 Oct 2026 showed the default branch master, a push on 15 Oct 2026, the homepage https://intelowlproject.github.io, and release v6.8.0 published 31 Aug 2026.
- Observables and files. The README names files plus IP, domain, URL, and hash observables, behind a Django REST API.
- Certego since v6.8.0. The README says management is fully in Certego's hands and links discussion 3654. The tag was published 31 Aug 2026.
- Site claims versus the API. The site says 4K+ stars and 200+ analyzers. The API on 17 Oct 2026 reported 4,761 stars and 693 forks.
The project website prints “4K+ Github Stars,” “250k+ Downloads,” “500+ Forks,” and “200+ Analyzers.” Those are the site's claims. The star count to cite from the API that day is 4,761, and the fork count is 693. This listing did not audit downloads or the analyzer catalog. A live-demo badge points at intelowl.honeynet.org. That URL returned a JavaScript application shell, not a result page, so it is not a capture. Docker is the install path the README badges. AGPL-3.0 is the license field. An analyzer row is one service's comment on a file or an observable. It is not a verdict you can brief without the raw report.
- 1
Deploy from the repository's Docker instructions. Cite v6.8.0, published 31 Aug 2026, until you move tags.
- 2
Read discussion 3654 before you describe who maintains the project.
- 3
Open the analyzer output behind a score. Keep the service name and the date in the note.
- 4
Use the API star count when you need a figure. Label the website's 200+ analyzers as the site's claim.
Caveats
04
An enrichment result is only as good as the analyzer that produced it and the date it ran. The README does not say a positive hit is proof of malice, and a missing hit is not proof of safety. Read the analyzer's raw output. Management since v6.8.0 is the README's statement about Certego. Discussion 3654 is the pointer. Do not describe the governance change beyond that sentence.
The website's “4K+” stars and “200+” analyzers are looser than the API. On 17 Oct 2026 the API reported 4,761 stars and 693 forks, against the site's “500+ Forks.” Quote the number with its source. The demo host requires JavaScript and was not a logged-in results screen. AGPL duties apply if you offer a modified IntelOwl as a service. Do not paste API keys into a listing or a screenshot.
Potential use cases
06
- An indicator needs enrichment you can run inside the network. IntelOwl is the AGPL-3.0 framework the README describes: files and observables such as an IP, a domain, a URL, or a hash, through a Django REST API, with pyintelowl as a client library. You deploy it with Docker. Release v6.8.0 was published 31 Aug 2026. The README says that since that version management is fully in Certego's hands and points at discussion 3654. Read that discussion before you describe governance.
- A slide says IntelOwl has 4K stars and 200 analyzers. The project website does print “4K+ Github Stars,” “250k+ Downloads,” “500+ Forks,” and “200+ Analyzers.” On 17 Oct 2026 the GitHub API reported 4,761 stars and 693 forks. Use the API figure when you need a count, and label the analyzer line as the site's claim. This listing did not inventory the analyzers and did not audit the download number.
- The honeynet demo is offered as a picture of a finished job. intelowl.honeynet.org returned a JavaScript application shell on 17 Oct 2026, not a result table. Do not describe a screen you did not open. An analyzer row, once you have one from your own instance, is that service's comment on the observable. Open the raw report and record the service name and the time. A hit is not a verdict, and a miss is not a clean bill of health.
Hard cases
The case where the first result is easy to over-read.
A third-party analyzer fee is called the IntelOwl price
The pages opened on 17 Oct 2026 do not print an IntelOwl subscription. Plugins that call other services can require those services' keys and those services' fees. Put that cost on the other vendor's page. AGPL-3.0 still applies to the framework if you offer a modified copy as a service. The 4,761-star figure is the API count for the review date, not the website's rounded 4K line.
Practitioners using it
Posts on X from people describing a concrete use. The quote is the post. Likes and reposts are the counts saved with it, not a live total. A label marks a creator, a maintainer, a data partner, or an investor.
IntelOwl: An open source solution for management of Threat Intelligence at scale. It integrates a number of analyzers available online and a lot of cutting-edge malware analysis tools. GitHub: https://t.co/7rPOZPvoPu pic.twitter.com/gGy1InfJkz
Another project to check out in the TIP vein: YETI+TheHive/Cortex. There's also IntelOwl, but that's just the enrichment side of things.
Indeed! I've been following IntelOwl for a while, and appreciate all the great work. We've built our own analyzers, but maybe I'll look at adding one for IntelOwl as well? 🤔
IntelOwl is an amazing OSINT tool to fetch threat intelligence data about a particular file or observable; querying multiple external and inbuilt analyzers, so you don't have to. Check it out!! #threatintelligence #osint #cybersecurity https://t.co/8tN07u2XhK
Maintainer
I was a Cortex user and little contributor. They are both good OS solutions. Imho Cortex can be fully leveraged only if used in combination with TheHive. I wanted a more modern and flexible application so IntelOwl came up. I invite you to try both and send us suggestions!
Questions
Is IntelOwl free?
The software is AGPL-3.0 and you host it. The pages opened on 17 Oct 2026 do not print an IntelOwl subscription. Third-party analyzers can still require their own keys.
Who maintains IntelOwl?
The README says that since v6.8.0 management is fully in Certego's hands, and it points at GitHub discussion 3654.
Citations
07
Titled sources. These public pages are what the quotes on this listing come from.
Product
IntelOwl project site
https://intelowlproject.github.ioDocumentation
IntelOwl repository
https://github.com/intelowlproject/IntelOwlDocumentation
IntelOwl v6.8.0 release
https://github.com/intelowlproject/IntelOwl/releases/tag/v6.8.0

